| OpenStreetMap | OSM contributors | US + Canada (continental) + Puerto Rico + USVI | transmission + distribution | ODbL |
| HIFLD US Transmission Lines (archive) | DHS HIFLD (frozen 2024-09-30) | US national | transmission | Public domain |
| BPA Transmission Lines | Bonneville Power Administration | Pacific Northwest | transmission | Public domain |
| Oregon Transmission Lines (lidar-traced) | Oregon GEOHub | Oregon | transmission | Open |
| BC Transmission Lines | BC Geographic Warehouse | British Columbia | transmission | OGL-BC |
| CanVec Res_MGT power lines (50K) | Natural Resources Canada | Canada national | transmission | OGL-Canada |
| Alaska Energy Authority transmission | Alaska Energy Authority | Alaska | transmission | Open |
| AEA Southeast interties | Alaska Energy Authority | Southeast Alaska | transmission | Open |
| Alaska DNR powerlines | Alaska DNR | Alaska | transmission | Open |
| California Electric Transmission Lines | California Energy Commission | California | transmission | Open |
| Ontario Utility Line (LIO) | Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources | Ontario | transmission | OGL-Ontario |
| Nova Scotia NSTDB utilities (UTTR50) | Nova Scotia | Nova Scotia | transmission | Open |
| Nova Scotia Power province-wide OVERHEAD distribution network — 185,830 of the 198,146 published polylines, with the 12,316 underground segments filtered out SERVER-SIDE at fetch (`Type='Overhead'`) so they are never downloaded or stored. The OH/UG flag is per SEGMENT and clean (exactly two values, no nulls), which makes this overhead-PROVEN rather than overhead-classified — contrast ny-nimo, whose flag is per feeder. Feeder number, phase and TWO voltage fields: `VoltagekVLL` is the feeder's line-to-line class (2.4–24.94 kV) and is what the compute reports as kV; `VoltageKV` is the segment's own operating voltage, which on a single-phase lateral is phase-to-neutral (14.4 on a 24.94 kV feeder). Distribution only — no transmission in the layer — so klass minor_line: candidate-excluded, tier D on its own, and its real value is corroborating the transmission crossings OSM/CanVec/ns-nstdb already see. Overturns the 2026-07-28 'Nova Scotia genuinely unserved' verdict | Nova Scotia Power Inc (NSPI) — Feeder Hosting Capacity map | NS | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side filter) |
| Yukon Energy transmission | GeoYukon | Yukon | transmission | Open |
| Yukon Energy distribution | GeoYukon | Yukon | distribution | Open |
| Alberta powerlines (AltaLIS base features) | Government of Alberta | Alberta | transmission | Open |
| Vermont Electric Co-op distribution | VT Open Geodata (VCGI) | Vermont (VEC territory) | distribution | Open |
| Florida DEP certified transmission corridors | Florida DEP | Florida | transmission | Open |
| Seattle City Light lines (overhead) | Seattle City Light / Seattle GeoData | Seattle + Skagit/Tolt corridors, WA | distribution | Open (City of Seattle) |
| Chelan County PUD overhead primary | Chelan County PUD | Chelan County, WA | distribution | Public service (snapshot 2026-07-12) |
| Chelan County PUD overhead secondary | Chelan County PUD | Chelan County, WA | distribution | Public service (snapshot 2026-07-12) |
| BLM Idaho Aerial Hazards v2 layer 10 — 469,193 SPAN-LEVEL polylines (median ~102 m pole-to-pole, 2 vertices), a federal BLM/NIFC compilation built FOR low-level flight hazard avoidance. ClassType splits it: 368,184 'ID Power Primary Overhead Line' = explicitly OVERHEAD primary distribution (klass minor_line: counts for crossings, never seeds candidates); 100,728 'Main Powerline' = transmission 46-500 kV, of which 82,584 carry OWNER='IPCO'; 281 'Wire Hazard'. SCOPE — this is a STATEWIDE IDAHO compilation, NOT the Idaho Power service territory: the overhead-primary rows carry OWNER=NULL and extend into Rocky Mountain Power / Idaho Falls Power country (45,698 segments around Pocatello) and Avista/co-op country in north Idaho. Only OWNER='IPCO' attributes to Idaho Power; a blanket 'Idaho Power' operator fallback was removed in Wave-7 (2026-08-01) after it mislabelled 7,534 published id crossings, including the Coeur d'Alene region which is Avista/Kootenai Electric outright. 'Wire Hazard' IS NOT ALL CONDUCTOR: OT_LABEL resolves 15 SKI LIFT + 3 CABLE CROSSING + 2 TRAMWAY = 20 aerial CABLEWAYS. They stay on the map as real hazards but are minor_line (not transmission-grade, candidate-excluded) and relabelled with OT_LABEL. VOLTAGE TRAP: fetch OPERATINGV (clean kV alias, all-NULL on overhead-primary, {46,69,138,161,230,345,500} on Main Powerline) — NEVER OPERATINGVOLTAGE, which is dual-domain and carries a coded 1-8 domain on the 368k overhead-primary rows. Companion layers in the same service: 2 = Wire Crossing (81 curated points, already in build_packs.py), 4 = Tower, 5 = NOE Area, 6 = Wind Farm. Anonymous, no token; maxRecordCount 2000, pagination + envelope spatial filters both work; native SR 102100 so pass outSR=4326. REJECTED on Idaho Power's own org, so nobody repeats it: InterconnectCapacity/FeatureServer/2 'injection_line' advertises 603,733 polylines but only 6,226 carry geometry, reducing to 180 unique transmission branches replicated across injection points — it is a WECC power-flow study, not an asset layer. Also rejected: FeedersWithLimitedHC (feeder POLYGONS), Gateway_W_Route (18 PROPOSED segments), I-CREWS layer 3 (verbatim HIFLD lineage). | BLM Idaho / NIFC aviation-hazard program (org T4QMspbfLg3qTGWY) | Idaho, statewide (NOT clipped to IPC territory; extent lon -117.142..-112.108, lat 41.997..45.575) | transmission (46-500 kV) + overhead primary distribution + aerial cableways | Public (federal) |
| USGS western powerline corridors (2004) | WyGISC GeoHub | Wyoming | transmission (dated backfill) | Public domain |
| Utah Transmission Lines (SGID) | Utah Geospatial Resource Center | Utah | transmission | CC BY 4.0 |
| Utah Electrical Lines 1:24k (SGID) | Utah Geospatial Resource Center | Utah | distribution | CC BY 4.0 |
| Colorado Xcel/non-Xcel transmission (2012) | NREL GDR / Xcel Energy | Colorado | transmission (dated backfill) | Public (GDR) |
| SaskPower transmission | SaskPower | Saskatchewan | transmission | Public service (snapshot 2026-07-12) |
| SaskPower overhead primary distribution | SaskPower | Saskatchewan | distribution | Public service (snapshot 2026-07-12) |
| SaskPower overhead secondary distribution | SaskPower | Saskatchewan | distribution | Public service (snapshot 2026-07-12) |
| SPP 69 kV sub-transmission (PSS/E geometry) | Southwest Power Pool | 14-state SPP footprint | sub-transmission | Public (snapshot) |
| Kansas Utility Lines (38 utilities, KCC dockets) | Kansas Corporation Commission | Kansas | transmission | Public |
| Sioux Falls Light & Power OH primary | City of Sioux Falls | Sioux Falls, SD | distribution | Public service (snapshot) |
| Sioux Falls Light & Power 69 kV transmission | City of Sioux Falls | Sioux Falls, SD | transmission | Public service (snapshot) |
| Sioux Falls Light & Power OH secondary | City of Sioux Falls | Sioux Falls, SD | distribution | Public service (snapshot) |
| Shakopee PU / MVEC OH primary | Shakopee Public Utilities / MVEC | Scott County, MN | distribution | Public item |
| Shakopee PU / MVEC OH secondary | Shakopee Public Utilities / MVEC | Scott County, MN | distribution | Public item |
| Iowa certified-sites electric lines | Iowa Economic Development Authority | Iowa (certified sites) | transmission + distribution | Iowa open geodata |
| City of Bastrop OH primary | City of Bastrop, TX | Bastrop / Lake Bastrop, TX | distribution | Public service (snapshot) |
| LCRA transmission (Georgetown-area clip) | LCRA via City of Georgetown | Georgetown/Leander, TX | transmission | Public (2019 clip) |
| ATC native transmission (Spring Valley, SE WI) | American Transmission Company | Racine/Kenosha, WI | transmission | Public service (snapshot) |
| ATC native transmission (CHC, SW WI) | American Transmission Company | Dane/Green, WI | transmission | Public service (snapshot) |
| ATC Plymouth-area existing transmission (Sheboygan Co) — 26 active lines of 29. ATC's own ASSET schema, not a route study: Status='active', RatingSegmentStatus='In-Svc', named maintenance sections (LYNG11 (LYN-ESV), 796L41 (WE-South)), MaintSectionVoltage 138/345 kV. OVERHEAD IS PROVEN BY THE CONDUCTOR SPEC, not by a flag: ConductorSizeOrType is ACSR (aluminium conductor STEEL REINFORCED — a steel tension core is a suspension conductor, never laid underground; the same decode that resolved on-oakville) and NumberOfShieldWires/ShieldWire1SizeType are populated, and shield wires exist only on overhead structures. TRAP: LineConfiguration here is SC/DC (single/double CIRCUIT), NOT the OH_SC of the Spring Valley layer — it is not the overhead test and must not be filtered on. Loaded by compute_crossings_wi.py under the shared src tag 'wi-atc' with the other three ATC project maps so one utility's own GIS cannot self-corroborate into tier A. | American Transmission Company (AGOL org 7PeVNOs9VhL7Dka9) | Sheboygan County, WI | transmission | Public service (snapshot) |
| ATC 'NC' project existing transmission (Wausau/Merrill, Lincoln-Marathon Co) — 18 active lines. Same ATC asset schema as wi-atc-p with truncated shapefile-style field names (MaintSec_2 = kV, MaintSec_1 = section name, RatingSe_2 = In-Svc, ConductorS = ACSR spec). Same overhead proof (ACSR + shield wires). Outside every WI flagship region bbox (44.95–45.24 N sits below minocqua-northwoods' 45.55 floor) → national tier. Shares the 'wi-atc' src tag. | American Transmission Company (AGOL org 7PeVNOs9VhL7Dka9) | Lincoln/Marathon County, WI | transmission | Public service (snapshot) |
| Town of Grand Chute 'Lowline Electric Transmission' — 285 polylines on the lower Fox at Appleton, INSIDE the winnebago-fox flagship bbox. WEAKEST POSTURE IN THE PIPELINE, on purpose. The layer's ENTIRE schema is OBJECTID / GlobalID / Shape__Length: no voltage, no owner, no status, and NO OH/UG FIELD. The service describes itself as 'for reference purposes only for the Town of Grand Chute comprehensive plan' — a planning-department digitisation, not a utility export — so overhead is an INFERENCE from the planning vocabulary ('highline' vs 'lowline'), not a proof. Ingested on the ut-elec / ri-gis precedent (attribute-free but real, independently digitised geometry) and given klass minor_line: tier D when single-source, candidate-excluded (the Wave-9 klass-keyed gate), never a ForeFlight pack pin, web map + lidar queue only. NOT TAKEN: sibling L2 'Highline Electric Transmission' is a SINGLE feature whose vertices sprawl -90.24..-88.07 / 42.31..44.69 — a generalised statewide trunk that duplicates HIFLD at far worse fidelity. | Town of Grand Chute, Outagamie County WI (AGOL org deR2GmCznCnyAVvu) | Appleton / lower Fox River, WI | distribution | Town of Grand Chute, reference-only (snapshot) |
| RIGIS above-ground transmission | Rhode Island GIS | Rhode Island | transmission | RIGIS, attribution |
| Prince William County HV transmission | Prince William County, VA | Prince William County, VA | transmission | County public |
| Loudoun County major power lines | Loudoun County, VA | Loudoun County, VA | transmission | County public |
| Montgomery County transmission lines | Montgomery County, PA | Montgomery County, PA | transmission | County public |
| NECEC HVDC centerline | Maine GeoLibrary | Franklin/Somerset ME lake belt | transmission (HVDC) | Maine open |
| Columbiana County rural electric lines | Columbiana County, OH | Columbiana County, OH | distribution | County public (snapshot) |
| Otero County Electric Coop distribution (aerial-hazard export) | DRMP / Otero County Electric Cooperative | Ruidoso / Sierra Blanca, NM | distribution | Public service (snapshot 2026-07-12) |
| City of Medicine Hat (muni electric utility) power lines | City of Medicine Hat (muni electric utility) | AB | distribution | City of Medicine Hat open |
| City of Decatur (Decatur Utilities, municipal electric) power lines | City of Decatur (Decatur Utilities, municipal electric) | AL | distribution | unstated-public-endpoint |
| City of Coolidge (municipal electric) power lines | City of Coolidge (municipal electric) | AZ | distribution | public AGOL (CoolidgeGIS) |
| City of New Westminster (muni electric utility) power lines | City of New Westminster (muni electric utility) | BC | distribution | Open Government Licence - New Westminster |
| City of Penticton Electric Utility (muni) power lines | City of Penticton Electric Utility (muni) | BC | distribution | public AGOL |
| Holy Cross Energy (co-op, via City of Aspen GIS) power lines | Holy Cross Energy (co-op, via City of Aspen GIS) | CO | distribution | public ArcGIS Server (Aspen Emergency service) |
| Broward County GIS power lines | Broward County GIS | FL | distribution | unstated-public-endpoint |
| City of Homestead (municipal electric) power lines | City of Homestead (municipal electric) | FL | distribution | unstated-public-endpoint |
| City of Tallahassee (municipal electric utility) power lines | City of Tallahassee (municipal electric utility) | FL | distribution | unstated-public-endpoint |
| City of Wauchula (municipal electric) power lines | City of Wauchula (municipal electric) | FL | distribution | unstated-public-endpoint |
| City of East Point (municipal electric) power lines | City of East Point (municipal electric) | GA | distribution | unstated-public-endpoint |
| US Army Corps of Engineers (Savannah) - Lake Lanier power lines | US Army Corps of Engineers (Savannah) - Lake Lanier | GA | distribution | unstated-public-endpoint |
| City of Vinton, LA (municipal electric, Calcasieu Parish) | City of Vinton, LA (municipal electric) | LA | distribution | public AGOL, no token |
| City of Wilton (municipal electric, Muscatine County) via Muscatine Area GIC power lines | City of Wilton (municipal electric, Muscatine County) via Muscatine Area GIC | IA | distribution | public AGOL, no token |
| MPW3 Muscatine power lines | MPW3 Muscatine | IA | distribution | public AGOL |
| Muscatine Power and Water OH3 power lines | Muscatine Power and Water OH3 | IA | distribution | public AGOL |
| City of Gardner, KS (municipal electric) power lines | City of Gardner, KS (municipal electric) | KS | distribution | public AGOL (gardnerkansas org) |
| Boone County / Northern KY GIS (NKY) transmission power lines | Boone County / Northern KY GIS (NKY) transmission | KY | distribution | unstated-public-endpoint |
| Owen Electric Coop / Northern KY GIS (NKY) - primary distribution power lines | Owen Electric Coop / Northern KY GIS (NKY) - primary distribution | KY | distribution | unstated-public-endpoint |
| Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government (TPCG municipal electric, Houma LA) power lines | Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government (TPCG municipal electric, Houma LA) | LA | distribution | TPCG public AGOL (owner ldl14 / tpcggis_tpcg) - open, no token; verify reuse terms |
| City of Kinston (KDPS municipal electric) - secondary power lines | City of Kinston (KDPS municipal electric) - secondary | NC | distribution | unstated-public-endpoint |
| Town of Smithfield Public Utilities (municipal electric) power lines | Town of Smithfield Public Utilities (municipal electric) | NC | distribution | unstated-public-endpoint — UPSTREAM WITHDRAWN 2026-08-03 (ArcGIS 499 item-inaccessible); serving the last good snapshot |
| City of Hamilton, Ohio (municipal electric) power lines | City of Hamilton, Ohio (municipal electric) | OH | distribution | public AGOL, no token |
| City of Cedar Park (PEC/Pedernales EC territory) power lines | City of Cedar Park (PEC/Pedernales EC territory) | TX | distribution | City of Cedar Park open GIS (verify terms) |
| Garkane Energy Cooperative power lines | Garkane Energy Cooperative | UT | distribution | public AGOL; item licenseInfo carries an 'internal use' boilerplate despite public sharing |
| Fairfax County (Virginia Power, Prince William Electric) power lines | Fairfax County (Virginia Power, Prince William Electric) | VA | distribution | Fairfax County open data |
| Burlington Electric Dept Pri power lines | Burlington Electric Dept Pri | VT | distribution | public AGOL |
| Green Mountain Power power lines | Green Mountain Power | VT | distribution | public AGOL (VCGI open data org) |
| Jefferson County PUD #1 power lines | Jefferson County PUD #1 | WA | distribution | public AGOL (Jefferson County PUD) |
| City of Spooner (municipal utility, Washburn County) power lines | City of Spooner (municipal utility, Washburn County) | WI | distribution | public AGOL, no token |
| New Richmond Utilities (municipal, St. Croix County) power lines | New Richmond Utilities (municipal, St. Croix County) | WI | distribution | public AGOL, no token |
| Kinston KDPS secondary OH conductor | City of Kinston (KDPS) | NC | distribution | public endpoint (no token) |
| Kinston KDPS transmission | City of Kinston (KDPS) | NC | distribution | public endpoint (no token) |
| Penticton secondary OH conductor | City of Penticton Electric Utility | BC | distribution | public endpoint (no token) |
| Homestead secondary OH conductor | City of Homestead | FL | distribution | public endpoint (no token) |
| Muscatine P&W secondary OH | Muscatine Power and Water | IA | distribution | public endpoint (no token) |
| Owen Electric secondary OH conductor | Owen Electric Cooperative / NKY GIS | KY | distribution | public endpoint (no token) |
| FAA Daily Digital Obstacle File (CATENARY/TRAMWAY) | FAA | US + limited Canada | charted wire obstacles | Public domain |
| NOAA ENC charted overhead cables (with clearances) | NOAA Office of Coast Survey — ENC Direct to GIS | US navigable waters | charted overhead cables + pipelines (VERCLR vertical clearances) | Public domain |
| USACE Inland ENC charted overhead cables (with clearances) | US Army Corps of Engineers — IENC | US inland river system (Mississippi, Ohio, Missouri, Illinois, Tennessee, Cumberland...) | charted overhead cables + pipelines (vertical clearances above high-water reference) | Public domain |
| CHELCO primary conductor (overhead) | Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative (AGOL chelcogis) | Walton/Okaloosa Co, FL — Choctawhatchee Bay | distribution | Public item |
| Peace River EC (PRECO) OH spans | Peace River Electric Cooperative (public AGOL org) | Central FL 10 counties incl. Kissimmee chain | distribution | Public item |
| Gulf Coast EC overhead primary (4 *_OH layers) | Gulf Coast Electric Cooperative (AGOL GCEC_Analyst) | Bay/Gulf/Washington Co, FL panhandle | distribution | Public item |
| Backcountry airstrip reference points + runway headings (ID+MT) | OurAirports (FAA/NASR-derived, public domain) | Idaho + Montana small_airport/seaplane_base | airstrip-points | Public domain |
| Backcountry airstrip + seaplane-base reference points + runway headings (AK) | OurAirports (FAA/NASR-derived, public domain) | Alaska small_airport/seaplane_base | airstrip-points | Public domain |
| Seaplane-base reference points + waterlane headings (US + Canada) | OurAirports (FAA/NASR + Nav Canada derived, public domain) | US + Canada seaplane_base | airstrip-points | Public domain |
| Aerial cableways over water (gondolas, cable cars, zip lines, conveyors) | OpenStreetMap contributors | US + Canada (338 water-crossing cableways) | aerial-cable | ODbL |
| Cable / reaction ferry crossings (surface cable across the water) | Provincial + state/county ferry operators (BC MoTI, SK Highways, AB Transportation, US DOTs) | US + Canada | surface-cable | Public records |
| FAA DOF transmission-tower strings (imagery-verified water crossings) | FAA Digital Obstacle File + aerial imagery review | US + border areas (72 confirmed + 55 candidate crossings) | tower-inference | Public domain |
| LUMA/PREPA distribution (overhead, veg-mgmt export) | LUMA Energy / PREPA via IEM | PR | distribution | public AGOL |
| SECO Energy overhead conductors | SECO Energy (Sumter EC), central FL | FL | distribution | public AGOL |
| FortisAlberta overhead primary (eMap) | FortisAlberta | AB | distribution | public AGOL (eMap) |
| FortisAlberta overhead secondary (eMap) | FortisAlberta | AB | distribution | public AGOL (eMap) |
| GNWT/NTPC transmission (voltage + conductor attrs) | GNWT Centre for Geomatics / NT Power Corp | NT | transmission | open government |
| Cowlitz County PUD primary overhead | Cowlitz County PUD No. 1 | WA | distribution | public AGOL |
| Idaho County Light & Power overhead lines | Idaho County Light & Power Coop | ID | distribution | public AGOL |
| Howell-Oregon EC primary overhead | Howell-Oregon Electric Coop (West Plains MO) | MO | distribution | public AGOL |
| Paducah Power System primary overhead | Paducah Power System | KY | distribution | public AGOL |
| Comanche EC primary overhead | Comanche Electric Coop Assn | TX | distribution | public AGOL |
| AEP Texas Central primary overhead (pilot) | AEP Texas (Corpus Christi division) | TX | distribution | public AGOL |
| Surprise Valley Electrification overhead primary | Surprise Valley Electrification Corp | CA/OR/NV | distribution | public AGOL |
| Anza Electric Coop primary overhead | Anza Electric Coop | CA | distribution | public AGOL |
| Nobles Cooperative Electric overhead | Nobles Cooperative Electric | MN | distribution | public AGOL |
| North Bay Hydro overhead network (Lake Nipissing / Trout Lake). THREE layers under one source id: OH_PRIMARY_2 5,966 overhead primary (LOCATION='OVERHEAD'), SECONDARY 9,944 overhead service drops (OH_UG prefix 'OH%' — the field mixes construction with gauge), and TRANSMISSION_1 647 of 652 44 kV subtransmission (5 dropped for Material '…UG'; Voltage is dirty, '44000' and '44kV' both appear, normalised to kV at fetch). UG_PRIMARY_2's 2,933 underground primary are deliberately never ingested. Kept as ONE src because secondary shares poles with the primary — separate ids would manufacture tier-A cross-validation out of a single utility's own data | North Bay Hydro Distribution | ON | distribution | public AGOL |
| Ponca City municipal overhead (live primary) | City of Ponca City Electric | OK | distribution | public AGOL |
| Miami OK municipal electric | City of Miami OK | OK | distribution | public AGOL |
| Anderson Municipal Light & Power overhead primary (2017 export) | Anderson Municipal Light & Power | IN | distribution | public AGOL |
| Bowling Green municipal primary overhead | Bowling Green OH Municipal Utilities | OH | distribution | public AGOL |
| Loveland Water & Power primary overhead | City of Loveland CO | CO | distribution | public AGOL |
| Nephi City overhead primary | Nephi City UT | UT | distribution | public AGOL |
| CMP + Versant distribution spans (no OH/UG flag — mixed, mostly overhead) | Central Maine Power + Versant, via Island Institute | ME | distribution | public AGOL republication |
| SWEPCO NW-Louisiana overhead (construction-code filter) | AEP / SWEPCO | LA | distribution | public AGOL |
| APS statewide overhead primary (wildfire map; geometry-only) | Arizona Public Service | AZ | distribution | public AGOL |
| SWEPCO Texas overhead spans | AEP / SWEPCO | TX | distribution | public AGOL |
| Oshawa PUC Networks overhead primary | Oshawa PUC Networks | ON | distribution | public AGOL |
| Jamestown BPU primary overhead | Jamestown Board of Public Utilities | NY | distribution | public AGOL |
| Town of Apex electric primary | Town of Apex NC | NC | distribution | public AGOL |
| Columbia River PUD overhead (copper-conductor subset) | Columbia River PUD (Columbia County OR) | OR | distribution | public AGOL |
| Huntsville airport authority overhead primaries (KHSV environs) | Huntsville-Madison County Airport Authority | AL | distribution | public AGOL |
| Rock Falls municipal electric | City of Rock Falls IL | IL | distribution | public AGOL |
| Owatonna Public Utilities overhead (2015 CAD lineage) | Owatonna Public Utilities | MN | distribution | public AGOL (proxied) |
| Utilities Kingston overhead feeders (capacity-map subset) | Utilities Kingston | ON | distribution | public AGOL |
| Flathead Electric Coop overhead primary | Flathead Electric Cooperative (Kalispell MT) | MT | distribution | public AGOL |
| SWEPCO Arkansas overhead (construction-code filter) | AEP / SWEPCO | AR | distribution | public AGOL |
| WIN Energy REMC overhead primary | WIN Energy REMC (Vincennes IN) | IN | distribution | public AGOL |
| Valley Electric Association overhead primary | Valley Electric Association (Pahrump NV) | NV/CA | distribution | public AGOL |
| Colquitt EMC primary (no OH/UG flag — mixed, mostly overhead) | Colquitt EMC via Southern GA Regional Commission | GA | distribution | public AGOL |
| Manitowoc Public Utilities overhead primary | Manitowoc Public Utilities | WI | distribution | public AGOL |
| Utilities Commission, City of New Smyrna Beach FL | UCNSB | FL | distribution | public AGOL |
| Hydro One distribution — Bowmanville ON study corridor (via WSP EA deliverable; project-scoped subset) | Hydro One Networks (via WSP) | ON | distribution | public AGOL (consultant-hosted; may be withdrawn) |
| Wright-Hennepin Coop EC — Corcoran MN (unofficial engineer-published phasing study) | Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association | MN | distribution | public AGOL (individual account; unofficial) |
| Lawrenceburg Municipal Utilities IN power lines | Lawrenceburg Municipal Utilities | IN | distribution | public AGOL |
| City of Sergeant Bluff IA municipal electric (via SIMPCO) | City of Sergeant Bluff | IA | distribution | public AGOL |
| Knightstown Municipal Electric IN | Knightstown Municipal Electric (IMPA) | IN | distribution | public AGOL |
| City of Plummer ID electric department | City of Plummer | ID | distribution | public AGOL |
| City of Camden SC electric utility | City of Camden | SC | distribution | public AGOL |
| City of Seaford DE electric department | City of Seaford | DE | distribution | public AGOL |
| City of Kimball NE Light & Power (MV + LV overhead) | City of Kimball Light & Power | NE | distribution | public AGOL |
| City of Sumas WA Light & Power | City of Sumas | WA | distribution | public AGOL |
| Oak City UT municipal power | Oak City Corporation | UT | distribution | public AGOL |
| NYSEG + RG&E overhead distribution circuits (Avangrid hosting-capacity snapshot, Apr 2018) | NYSEG / Rochester Gas & Electric (Avangrid) | NY | distribution | public AGOL (frozen 2018 snapshot) |
| Duke Energy Kentucky — Turfway corridor slice (via Jacobs siting project) | Duke Energy Kentucky (via Jacobs) | KY | distribution | public AGOL (consultant-hosted subset) |
| Florida Keys Electric Cooperative — Islamorada (via Clearview Geographic VA study) | Florida Keys Electric Cooperative | FL | distribution | public AGOL (consultant-hosted subset) |
| Riverside Public Utilities CA — OH primary in Very High Fire Hazard zones (subset) | Riverside Public Utilities | CA | distribution | public AGOL (fire-hazard-zone subset) |
| City of South Sioux City NE municipal electric (partial) | City of South Sioux City | NE | distribution | public AGOL |
| Homer Electric Association — Kenai Peninsula AK overhead lines | Homer Electric Association | AK | distribution | public AGOL |
| BC Hydro distribution — Spallumcheen/Vernon window (via District of Spallumcheen heat study) | BC Hydro (via District of Spallumcheen) | BC | distribution | public AGOL (third-party republish, study window) |
| City of Castroville TX municipal electric | City of Castroville | TX | distribution | public AGOL |
| Centralia City Light WA (primary + secondary overhead) | Centralia City Light | WA | distribution | public AGOL |
| Pacific Power (PacifiCorp) distribution — Hood River County / Columbia Gorge (county GIS). SUPERSEDED IN COVERAGE by `pacificorp-d`, the utility's own six-state layer, and ALIASED ONTO IT (lib_src_alias) so one network counts as one source: measured over this layer's own extent (-121.668..-121.441, 45.562..45.714), 2,580 of its 2,645 features (97.5%) have a pacificorp-d part within 30 m, at 231 km against 223 km of line. KEPT rather than retired — unlike co-xcelcarbond, which was 113 spans carrying zero crossings — because the 2.5% the utility layer does not reproduce is real coverage inside the `or` flagship's columbia-gorge-or region. Retire it if a later PacifiCorp pull reaches 100% | PacifiCorp (via Hood River County GIS) | OR | distribution | public AGOL |
| Lafayette Utilities System LA overhead primary | Lafayette Utilities System | LA | distribution | public AGOL |
| PG&E primary feeder circuits, 19 NorCal divisions (DRP compliance export; includes underground sections — no OH/UG flag published) | Pacific Gas & Electric | CA | distribution | public AGOL (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Oncor overhead lines digitized by City of Wylie TX (geometry only) | Oncor (via City of Wylie GIS) | TX | distribution | public AGOL (third-party digitization) |
| Town of Tarboro NC municipal electric | Town of Tarboro | NC | distribution | public AGOL |
| Holy Cross Energy western district (Rifle/Parachute CO, via wildfire study) | Holy Cross Energy | CO | distribution | public AGOL (study republish) |
| City of Valley City ND municipal electric (Sheyenne River) | City of Valley City | ND | distribution | public AGOL |
| City of Rocky Mount NC municipal electric (overhead 1-3 phase + 69kV ties) | City of Rocky Mount | NC | distribution | public AGOL |
| USVI WAPA overhead power (full territory grid, recovery-mapped via Witt O'Brien's; Voltage field is line-to-neutral — 7.2 = 12.47 kV class) | Virgin Islands Water & Power Authority (via Witt O'Brien's) | VI | distribution | public AGOL |
| Portland General Electric overhead transmission (structural OH/UG split — the layer IS the legend; geometry only, no voltage or circuit id published) | Portland General Electric | OR | transmission | public AGOL |
| Portland General Electric overhead primary distribution (28,359 parts exploded from one dissolved multiline; underground twin L18 deliberately not ingested; geometry only, no voltage or circuit id published) | Portland General Electric | OR | distribution | public AGOL |
| Entergy Louisiana circuit model, statewide minus Orleans Parish (977,355 segments; NO OH/UG flag, no voltage, no phase — mixed posture, mostly overhead; feeder + substation only) | Entergy Louisiana (published via DataCapable Inc, Entergy's outage-map vendor) | LA | distribution | public AGOL (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Entergy New Orleans circuit model, Orleans Parish (83,064 segments; same no-OH/UG posture as la-entergy — completes statewide Entergy coverage) | Entergy New Orleans (published via DataCapable Inc) | LA | distribution | public AGOL (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Southern California Edison ICA circuit segments, 3-phase (524,522 segments; circuit_name + circuit_voltage kV + substation; NO OH/UG attribute exists on any ICA layer — mixed overhead/underground, stated posture, candidate-excluded, tier D on its own) | Southern California Edison (CPUC Rule 21 DRPEP/ICA public data) | CA | distribution | public AGOL (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Southern California Edison ICA circuit segments, non-3-phase laterals (533,007 segments; same schema and same no-OH/UG posture as ca-sce) | Southern California Edison (CPUC Rule 21 DRPEP/ICA public data) | CA | distribution | public AGOL (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Southern California Edison transmission circuits (1,030 circuits, 33-500 kV; CIRCUIT_TYPE_DESC Transmission/Subtransmission/Distribution). Utility-authored transmission geometry, but UG-unfiltered like the rest of the ICA service — so single-source crossings stay tier C (not B) and it seeds no bank-termination candidates | Southern California Edison (CPUC Rule 21 DRPEP/ICA public data) | CA | transmission | public AGOL (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Con Edison (CECONY) nodal hosting-capacity distribution segments, NYC + Westchester (126,467 segments = FeatureServer L0 3-phase + L1 1PH/2PH merged into ONE source so the utility cannot cross-validate itself; feeder id + substation + kV + circuit name). NO OH/UG attribute exists in the service and CECONY is the most undergrounded utility in North America — the overhead fraction is Westchester, Staten Island and outer Queens. Mixed posture, stated: candidate-excluded, tier D on its own, lidar-checked rather than asserted | Consolidated Edison Co of New York (NY Joint Utilities hosting-capacity portal) | NY | distribution | public AGOL (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Niagara Mohawk / National Grid NY primary conductor segments, upstate NY (452,496 published; UNDERGROUND FEEDERS REMOVED AT FETCH by joining the sibling NYSDP/DistAssetsOverview OH and UG feeder lists on feeder id — explicit `Construction` field, 1,859 of 1,912 HC feeders classify OH, 29 UG dropped, 24 unmatched kept as construction=unknown). The OH/UG flag is FEEDER-level, not per-segment, so this is overhead-classified rather than overhead-proven: klass minor_line like the NYSEG/RG&E overhead layer, candidate-excluded, tier D on its own | Niagara Mohawk Power Corp d/b/a National Grid (NY DSIP system data portal) | NY | distribution | public ArcGIS Server (overhead-classified by feeder join, stated) |
| ENMAX Power Calgary primary distribution, Feeder Load Capacity Rev9 (47,182 segments = FeatureServer L0 two/three-phase 30,057 + L1 single-phase 17,125 MERGED into ONE source so a single-phase lateral cannot cross-validate the three-phase trunk it tees off; FEEDERID + Phase_Designation + binned available kVA). NO OH/UG ATTRIBUTE EXISTS — confirmed by enumerating the whole AGOL org, whose only siblings are boundaries, an outage map and the superseded Rev8, so there is no asset service to join the way ny-nimo joins DistAssetsOverview. Calgary is heavily undergrounded in post-1970s residential. Mixed posture, stated: klass minor_line, candidate-excluded, tier D on its own. NO voltage field of any kind on either layer, so kv is null rather than guessed. Native SR Calgary 3TM W114 -> outSR=4326 | ENMAX Power Corporation (AGOL org NKgP4VcXUzEyOnmg) | AB | distribution | public AGOL (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Synergy North overhead distribution feeders, Thunder Bay + Kenora (15,959 overhead of 22,028 = TB 15,407 + KN 552, both divisions under one source id). OVERHEAD-PROVEN, not mixed: the 2026-07-31 research record recorded 'no construction/OH-UG attribute', but `Configuration` is an explicit two-value Overhead/Underground flag (same field name and meaning as the OEB CCIM), so the WHERE clause is the entire underground exclusion and the 6,069 UG segments are never fetched — ab-fortis / fl-seco / ns-nspower class. Per-segment station, feeder, phase and voltage; kv keys off the line-to-line 3-phase figure so a single-phase lateral off a 24.95 kV feeder is not reported as a 14.4 kV wire. Layers 0/1/2/4/6 are five symbology VIEWS over one feeder table with identical counts — layer 0 only. Kenora is inside the Ontario flagship's nw-ontario region (Lake of the Woods float-plane country); Thunder Bay is outside every flagship bbox and surfaces in the national tier. Native SR differs per division (3857 / 26915) -> outSR=4326 | Synergy North Corporation (AGOL org F0yTspJEm6Cf0vx3) | ON | distribution | public AGOL (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Oakville Hydro overhead distribution, CapacityLines (1,436 overhead of 31,885 — Oakville is ~95% underground). THE OH/UG DECODE: the research record left construction UNRESOLVED and flagged two traps, both real — `Owner` is OWNERSHIP (OH=Oakville Hydro, H1=Hydro One, CU=customer), NOT overhead, and the unlabeled `SubType` is undecoded and did not discriminate. Resolved off a third field the record did not test, `Conductor`: '..._N/A_BARE' bare ACSR/AL (1,328) and '..._PEI' polyethylene-covered ACSR/AL tree wire (108) are overhead — ACSR has a steel tension core and is never laid underground — while '..._XLPE_26X#14AWG_CU' cross-linked-poly cable with a concentric neutral (30,404) is underground primary. That also explains the inconclusive CCIM cross-check: BOTH subtypes are ~95% underground so the base rate swamped the sample. Independently corroborated by `OperatingV`, unpopulated on 1,462 segments of which 1,436 are exactly this overhead set; all are Enabled=1 on real TS feeders, so the zero means 'not in the modelled capacity network', not de-energized — and kv stays null because the field is genuinely empty for overhead. SubType remains undecoded and unused. Outside every flagship bbox (lat 43.4) -> national tier. Native SR 3857 -> outSR=4326 | Oakville Hydro Electricity Distribution Inc (AGOL org h6Ms5Az9L6Wg9ogM) | ON | distribution | public AGOL (overhead decoded from conductor spec, stated) |
| Espanola Regional Hydro overhead network, North Channel / Manitoulin (332 overhead = 279 OH primary + 10 of 11 44 kV subtransmission + 43 overhead secondary, all three layers under ONE source id because secondary shares poles with the primary). Construction is unambiguous: the SERVICE NAME is the legend (OH_PRIMARY vs UG_PRIMARY), and UG_PRIMARY's 72 underground primary are never ingested; the 1 subtransmission segment with Material 'UG' is dropped; secondary is prefix-matched OH% on the OH_UG field. TRAP: do NOT copy on-nbh's LOCATION='OVERHEAD' filter — on North Bay's OH_PRIMARY_2 it keeps 5,966 of 6,019, but on Espanola's OH_PRIMARY it keeps 5 of 279 (LOCATION is null on 272 and reads 'HONI' on 2; here it is a location note, not a construction flag). NON-ZERO LAYER IDS (/142, /141, /1, /145) — /0 returns nothing. Shares AGOL org B2ViGAbIoKMou17w with North Bay Hydro: two distinct LDCs in one org, disambiguate by coordinates (~-81.8/46.25) not by name. Small but genuine float-plane country; sits 0.11 deg west of the Ontario flagship's temagami-nipissing edge -> national tier | Espanola Regional Hydro Distribution Corp (AGOL org B2ViGAbIoKMou17w) | ON | distribution | public AGOL (explicit overhead, service-name split) |
| NSTAR Electric (Eversource) Massachusetts primary distribution — 603,054 segments = eastern MA 502,075 (Boston, the South Shore, Cape Cod and the Islands) + western MA 100,979 (the former WMECo: Springfield, the Berkshires, the Quabbin/Connecticut-River corridor), MERGED into ONE source id because they are one operating company and the halves abut along the Worcester meridian, where two ids would let Eversource cross-validate itself into tier A. THE RESEARCH RECORD FOUND ONLY THE EASTERN SERVICE: DG_Hosting_Final publishes four sibling services (CT 729,527 / EMA 502,075 / NH 390,774 / WMA 100,979), so the record's single 502k entry was 29% of the available Eversource geometry — the other three are now ct-eversource, nh-eversource and the western half of this one. NO OH/UG ATTRIBUTE EXISTS on any of the four (field lists checked individually: asset tag, circuit, substation, phase, voltage and hosting capacity only; the Pole_Data folder next door is not public), and eastern MA runs heavy urban URD — so this is the ca-pge / ny-coned / ca-sce mixed posture, stated: klass minor_line, candidate-excluded, tier D on its own, registered in compute_national.MIXED_POSTURE. Its value is corroborating the transmission crossings OSM/HIFLD already see and giving cape-cod-plymouth and quabbin-connecticut-river utility-authored geometry for the first time. HARVEST: ArcGIS Server 10.41 with supportsPagination=false — ANY paging parameter is rejected, orderByFields keysets cost 76 s/1,000 rows, and adaptive key-range windows cost 0.54 s for the same rows (see esri_window_stream). The eastern layer is a VIEW whose ESRI_OID is not a queryable column, so it windows on the 15-digit TAG instead; the western layer has a real ID. Spatial filters silently return 0 features. Voltage normalised to float kV at fetch (string on EMA/WMA, double on CT/NH). outSR=4326 mandatory (native SR is NAD83 / Massachusetts mainland ftUS) | NSTAR Electric Company d/b/a Eversource Energy — DG hosting-capacity map | MA | distribution | public utility-hosted ArcGIS Server, anonymous (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Connecticut Light & Power (Eversource CT) primary distribution — 729,527 segments, the whole state bar the United Illuminating coastal strip and the municipals. The largest of the four Eversource DG-hosting services and the one the 2026-07-31 research record missed entirely; it is what finally puts utility-authored conductor geometry under the candlewood-housatonic flagship region (Candlewood, Lillinonah, Zoar and the Housatonic down to Stratford), which until now was HIFLD + OSM only. Same posture and same harvest as ma-eversource: NO OH/UG attribute anywhere in the service, so klass minor_line, candidate-excluded, tier D alone, in MIXED_POSTURE; adaptive OBJECTID-range windows because the service cannot paginate and cannot afford an ORDER BY. Voltage normalised to float kV at fetch. outSR=4326 mandatory | The Connecticut Light and Power Company d/b/a Eversource Energy | CT | distribution | public utility-hosted ArcGIS Server, anonymous (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Public Service of New Hampshire (Eversource NH) primary distribution — 390,774 segments statewide. Fourth of the four DG-hosting services and, like ct-eversource, absent from the research record. NOT a southern-New-England source: it belongs to the nhvt flagship (Winnipesaukee/Squam and the Connecticut River above the MA line), so the Wave-5 pass ingested it at NATIONAL tier only; the compute_crossings_nhvt.py region wiring landed in Wave-7 (2026-08-01, task w7-eversource-ctnh) — 379,461 of the 390,774 sections fall inside the nh-vt-lakes envelope, and they are the FIRST utility-authored conductor geometry the project holds for the New Hampshire side of that region. Same posture and harvest as its siblings: no OH/UG attribute, klass minor_line, candidate-excluded, tier D alone, in MIXED_POSTURE; adaptive OBJECTID-range windows; voltage normalised to float kV at fetch; outSR=4326 mandatory | Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource Energy | NH | distribution | public utility-hosted ArcGIS Server, anonymous (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Massachusetts Electric (National Grid MA) OVERHEAD distribution network — 1,808 per-feeder MULTIPART polylines holding 92,333 overhead path segments across central and eastern MA, from MASDP_Overview layers 1 (three-phase, 932) and 4 (single-phase, 876). OVERHEAD-PROVEN: Construction reads 'OH' on every row of both layers, so the layer id IS the underground exclusion and the UG twins (layers 2 and 5) are never fetched — ns-nspower / ab-fortis / fl-seco class. THIS IS NOT THE LAYER THE RESEARCH RECORD POINTED AT, deliberately. The record names Nodal_Hosting_Capacity_MA/2 (143,066 conductor segments) and notes the OH/UG flag is absent there; the ny-nimo workaround of joining a sibling OH/UG feeder list DOES NOT TRANSFER, because measured here 955 of the 961 OH feeders also appear in the UG list (a feeder has both kinds of section), so a feeder-level join would classify essentially nothing and the nodal layer can only be ingested as underground-contaminated. The Overview OH layers give the same wires with the underground already removed, at feeder granularity instead of segment granularity — a better trade. Per-feeder nominal kV (2.4–34.5) is joined at fetch from the sibling MASDP_Feeders service on Master_CDF (1,029 of 1,808 matched); the OH layers carry no voltage of their own. Distribution only, so klass minor_line: candidate-excluded (a distribution line-end at a shoreline is normal), tier D on its own, and its real work is corroborating the transmission crossings OSM/HIFLD already see. Same host and same DNS-over-HTTPS + curl --resolve pin as the NY portal (ny-nimo). Native SR 3857 -> outSR=4326 | Massachusetts Electric Company d/b/a National Grid (MA DPU system data portal) | MA | distribution | public ArcGIS Server (explicit per-layer overhead flag) |
| Rhode Island Energy (ex-Narragansett Electric / National Grid RI) OVERHEAD distribution network — 676 per-feeder MULTIPART polylines holding 36,802 overhead path segments statewide, from RISDP/RIElecDistFdrsPhases layers 1 (three-phase, 349) and 4 (single-phase, 327). The research record mentions the RISDP folder only in passing ('if wanted'); it has the identical structure to MASDP, so Rhode Island's incumbent utility comes in on exactly the same terms as ma-natgrid: Construction='OH' on every row, the UG twins (layers 2 and 5) never fetched, OVERHEAD-PROVEN. This is the first utility-authored conductor geometry the project holds for Rhode Island — the narragansett-ri flagship region previously had HIFLD + OSM + the RIGIS transmission digitisation (ri-gis) only, and ri-gis is attribute-sparse, so this is also the first RI source carrying a voltage. Per-feeder nominal kV (4.16–13.8) joined at fetch from RISDP_feeders on Master_CDF (352 of 676 matched). klass minor_line: candidate-excluded, tier D alone, corroboration-grade. Same host and DNS pin as ma-natgrid / ny-nimo. Native SR 3857 -> outSR=4326 | The Narragansett Electric Company d/b/a Rhode Island Energy (RI PUC system data portal) | RI | distribution | public ArcGIS Server (explicit per-layer overhead flag) |
| Hydro One Networks Inc. — 15,221 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. Measured against the two Ontario territories where the utility also publishes its own true conductor polylines (Synergy North, Oakville Hydro): 81% of real conductor length falls inside a CCIM polygon — the corridors do follow the network — but the extracted axis sits a median 37.5 m from the nearest actual wire and only 22% of it is within 15 m, and corridor widths reach a p90 of 272 m before the 60 m gate drops them. Same treatment as the SDG&E grid trace. Full measurement campaign in data/DATA_MANIFEST.md. Hydro One Networks is the CCIM's largest LDC and covers rural and cottage Ontario, territory no other open source reaches; it overlaps the small WSP-hosted on-honi-bowm study corridor, and the never-corroborates rule is what keeps that overlap from manufacturing tier A. | Hydro One Networks Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Alectra Utilities Corporation — 1,575 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Alectra Utilities Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited — 1,437 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Hydro Ottawa Limited — 878 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Hydro Ottawa Limited (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Enova Power Corp. — 778 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Enova Power Corp. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| London Hydro Inc. — 769 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | London Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Elexicon Energy Inc. — 706 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Elexicon Energy Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| GrandBridge Energy Inc. (Formerly Energy+ Inc.) — 640 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | GrandBridge Energy Inc. (Formerly Energy+ Inc.) (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| PUC Distribution Inc. — 397 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | PUC Distribution Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Niagara Peninsula Energy Inc. — 371 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Niagara Peninsula Energy Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Burlington Hydro Inc. — 333 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Burlington Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| GrandBridge Energy Inc. (Formerly Brantford Power Inc.) — 272 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | GrandBridge Energy Inc. (Formerly Brantford Power Inc.) (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Greater Sudbury Hydro Inc. — 269 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Greater Sudbury Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Algoma Power Inc. — 267 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Algoma Power Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Canadian Niagara Power Inc. — 267 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Canadian Niagara Power Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Newmarket-Tay Power Distribution Ltd. — 262 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Newmarket-Tay Power Distribution Ltd. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Halton Hills Hydro Inc. — 247 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Halton Hills Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Lakeland Power Distribution Ltd. — 240 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Lakeland Power Distribution Ltd. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Milton Hydro Distribution Inc. — 234 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Milton Hydro Distribution Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| ENWIN Utilities Ltd. — 218 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | ENWIN Utilities Ltd. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| InnPower Corporation — 181 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | InnPower Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| ERTH Power Corporation — 179 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | ERTH Power Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Westario Power Inc. — 174 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Westario Power Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Ottawa River Power Corporation — 165 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Ottawa River Power Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| EPCOR Electricity Distribution Ontario Inc. — 163 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | EPCOR Electricity Distribution Ontario Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Welland Hydro-Electric System Corp. — 150 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Welland Hydro-Electric System Corp. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Cornwall Street Railway Light and Power Company Limited — 148 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Cornwall Street Railway Light and Power Company Limited (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Essex Powerlines Corporation — 126 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Essex Powerlines Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Bluewater Power Distribution Corporation — 108 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Bluewater Power Distribution Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Entegrus Powerlines Inc. — 100 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Entegrus Powerlines Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Festival Hydro Inc. — 96 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Festival Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Orillia Power Distribution Corporation — 91 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Orillia Power Distribution Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Orangeville Hydro Limited — 70 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Orangeville Hydro Limited (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Lakefront Utilities Inc. — 67 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Lakefront Utilities Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Wasaga Distribution Inc. — 67 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Wasaga Distribution Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Fort Frances Power Corporation — 65 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Fort Frances Power Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Centre Wellington Hydro Ltd. — 59 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Centre Wellington Hydro Ltd. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Sioux Lookout Hydro Inc. — 35 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Sioux Lookout Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Tillsonburg Hydro Inc. — 34 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Tillsonburg Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| E.L.K. Energy Inc. — 29 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | E.L.K. Energy Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Township of North Algona Wilberforce — 28 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Township of North Algona Wilberforce (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Township of Bonnechere Valley — 24 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Township of Bonnechere Valley (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Renfrew Hydro Inc. — 21 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Renfrew Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Wellington North Power Inc. — 21 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Wellington North Power Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Grimsby Power Incorporated — 20 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Grimsby Power Incorporated (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Cooperative Hydro Embrun Inc. — 19 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Cooperative Hydro Embrun Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Northern Ontario Wires Inc. — 18 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Northern Ontario Wires Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Niagara-On-The-Lake Hydro Inc. — 17 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Niagara-On-The-Lake Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Rideau St. Lawrence Distribution Inc. — 17 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Rideau St. Lawrence Distribution Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Atikokan Hydro Inc. — 11 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Atikokan Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Hearst Power Distribution Company Limited — 3 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Hearst Power Distribution Company Limited (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Hydro Hawkesbury Inc. — 2 overhead corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — ~35 m positional uncertainty: the OEB map publishes corridor POLYGONS and we ship each one's medial axis. Overhead is proven per segment (underground never downloaded), but position is not: tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Hydro Hawkesbury Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (explicit per-segment overhead flag) |
| Hydro One Networks Inc. — 16,827 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Hydro One Networks Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Algoma Power Inc. — 350 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Algoma Power Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Hydro Ottawa Limited — 108 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Hydro Ottawa Limited (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Township of Bonnechere Valley — 98 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Township of Bonnechere Valley (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Alectra Utilities Corporation — 57 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Alectra Utilities Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Elexicon Energy Inc. — 53 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Elexicon Energy Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Niagara Peninsula Energy Inc. — 41 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Niagara Peninsula Energy Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Essex Powerlines Corporation — 39 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Essex Powerlines Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Township of North Algona Wilberforce — 37 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Township of North Algona Wilberforce (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Enova Power Corp. — 36 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Enova Power Corp. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Greater Sudbury Hydro Inc. — 35 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Greater Sudbury Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| GrandBridge Energy Inc. (Formerly Energy+ Inc.) — 34 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | GrandBridge Energy Inc. (Formerly Energy+ Inc.) (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Atikokan Hydro Inc. — 25 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Atikokan Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Sioux Lookout Hydro Inc. — 21 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Sioux Lookout Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Lakeland Power Distribution Ltd. — 20 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Lakeland Power Distribution Ltd. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Cornwall Street Railway Light and Power Company Limited — 18 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Cornwall Street Railway Light and Power Company Limited (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Bluewater Power Distribution Corporation — 16 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Bluewater Power Distribution Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Hearst Power Distribution Company Limited — 16 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Hearst Power Distribution Company Limited (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| London Hydro Inc. — 16 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | London Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| PUC Distribution Inc. — 16 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | PUC Distribution Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Canadian Niagara Power Inc. — 15 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Canadian Niagara Power Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Milton Hydro Distribution Inc. — 15 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Milton Hydro Distribution Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| InnPower Corporation — 8 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | InnPower Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Wasaga Distribution Inc. — 8 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Wasaga Distribution Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| EPCOR Electricity Distribution Ontario Inc. — 7 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | EPCOR Electricity Distribution Ontario Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| ERTH Power Corporation — 6 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | ERTH Power Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Grimsby Power Incorporated — 6 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Grimsby Power Incorporated (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Halton Hills Hydro Inc. — 6 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Halton Hills Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Ottawa River Power Corporation — 6 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Ottawa River Power Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Rideau St. Lawrence Distribution Inc. — 6 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Rideau St. Lawrence Distribution Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Westario Power Inc. — 6 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Westario Power Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Cooperative Hydro Embrun Inc. — 5 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Cooperative Hydro Embrun Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Entegrus Powerlines Inc. — 5 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Entegrus Powerlines Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Hydro Hawkesbury Inc. — 5 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Hydro Hawkesbury Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Burlington Hydro Inc. — 4 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Burlington Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Festival Hydro Inc. — 4 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Festival Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Fort Frances Power Corporation — 4 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Fort Frances Power Corporation (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Niagara-On-The-Lake Hydro Inc. — 4 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Niagara-On-The-Lake Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Renfrew Hydro Inc. — 4 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Renfrew Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Tillsonburg Hydro Inc. — 4 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Tillsonburg Hydro Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Newmarket-Tay Power Distribution Ltd. — 3 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Newmarket-Tay Power Distribution Ltd. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Centre Wellington Hydro Ltd. — 2 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Centre Wellington Hydro Ltd. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Northern Ontario Wires Inc. — 2 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Northern Ontario Wires Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| E.L.K. Energy Inc. — 1 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | E.L.K. Energy Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Hydro 2000 Inc. — 1 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Hydro 2000 Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Lakefront Utilities Inc. — 1 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Lakefront Utilities Inc. (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited — 1 UNFLAGGED corridor traces from the OEB Centralized Capacity Information Map. OVERHEAD INFERRED, NOT FLAGGED — the OEB's `configuration` field is blank on these segments, so unlike the on-ccim- rows the overhead claim here is not per-segment evidence. It rests on the LDC's own network: the blanks concentrate in the rural and northern LDCs (Atikokan 76% blank, Bonnechere Valley 64%, Hearst 52%, Algoma 49%, Hydro One 35%) where distribution is overhead as a matter of Shield rock and 40 km feeders, and eleven of them report ZERO underground segments anywhere in their territory. Explicit Underground is never ingested. Position carries the same corridor-trace limit as every CCIM row: ~35 m uncertainty, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. | Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited (via Ontario Energy Board CCIM, gis.planview.ca) | ON | distribution | public ArcGIS Enterprise, anonymous (construction field blank on these segments) |
| OG&E overhead transmission, Oklahoma + western Arkansas (1,744 lines, 69/138/161/345/500 kV). OVERHEAD-PROVEN TWICE OVER: the layer is 'OH Transmission' and SUBTYPE='OH Transmission' is the only distinct value on it; the companion 1-feature UG Transmission layer is never fetched. A utility geometric-network export, not a survey — per-line LINE_NAME, CIRCUIT, PHASE_DESIGNATION, RULING_SPAN, WIRE_SAG_CURVE and COND_MAX_TENSION — so it is the first routed transmission geometry Oklahoma has had here that is not the frozen HIFLD archive. 20 lines read OPERATING_VOLTAGE='De-Energized'; they are kept with a null kV, because a de-energized line still has conductor strung between its towers. Wired into the mpr flagship (grand-lake-oklahoma) and tier-B-eligible alone. RECORD CORRECTION: the 2026-07-31 verdict said the server speaks JSON only and needs esriJSON conversion — re-probed at ingest, supportedQueryFormats is 'JSON, geoJSON, PBF' and f=geojson works. NOT INGESTED, worth a follow-up: layer 4 is 76,826 transmission STRUCTURE points carrying STRUCTUREHEIGHT and STRUCTURECLASS. | Oklahoma Gas & Electric (arcgis.oge.com, unauthenticated ArcGIS Server 10.91) | OK + western AR | transmission | public ArcGIS Server, anonymous (explicit overhead layer split) |
| Salt River Project Public Safety Power Shutoff circuits, Tonto Basin / NE Maricopa-Gila Co., Arizona (3 multipart circuits: TontoBasin9068R, FZ112, PN145 — 137 paths). Real as-built conductor traces, but SCOPE IS SRP's WILDFIRE PSPS CIRCUITS ONLY, a few hundred km of high-fire-risk feeder — not the 1.17M-customer Phoenix-metro system, which SRP does not publish. OVERHEAD IS INFERRED, NOT PROVEN: there is no OH/UG field, no voltage and no phase count on the layer. A PSPS circuit is de-energized precisely because it is overhead in a high-fire-threat district (undergrounding is the standard PSPS mitigation, not something that gets shut off), so these are almost certainly overhead — but that is an inference about a programme, not a per-segment flag, so the source takes the mixed posture: klass minor_line, tier D when single-source, candidate-excluded. Two of the three circuits fall inside the az flagship's salt-verde region (Roosevelt/Apache/Canyon/Saguaro reservoirs); PN145 is east of it and reaches the national tier only. | Salt River Project (AGOL org ICaY8VX3lsUsMBRl) | AZ | distribution (wildfire PSPS circuits) | public AGOL, anonymous (no construction attribute — overhead inferred) |
| San Diego Gas & Electric overhead distribution — 17,274 GRID-TRACE lines (5,540 km) chained from 194,890 overhead ICA hosting-capacity cells (of 497,700; the 302,810 underground are excluded server-side and never downloaded). THE FIRST SDG&E CONDUCTOR GEOMETRY OF ANY KIND — SDG&E, SCE and IID had all published nothing, which is the gap recorded in the scr section of DATA_MANIFEST. NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE: SDG&E publishes 76.0 x 38.2 m rectangles, one per stretch of feeder, so the wire is somewhere inside its cell — max 42.5 m off, RMS 24.6 m. Measured against OSM's independently-mapped distribution in the same territory, the trace sits a median 20 m away, inside that bound. Overhead is proven per cell (explicit OHUG field), position is not, so it takes the positional-trace posture: klass minor_line, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. RECORD CORRECTION: the verdict's '4,155 sq m' cell is the Web-Mercator Shape__Area, inflated by 1/cos^2(lat); the true cell is 2,896 m^2. ACCESS: the documented portal interconnectionmapsdge.extweb.sempra.com needs a login and the *_NDA services are secured, but the ICA_MAP_PROD_*Grids_VW views on the AGOL org are anonymously queryable. Wired into the scr flagship (san-diego-reservoirs). | San Diego Gas & Electric (AGOL org S0EUI1eVapjRPS5e) | San Diego County, CA | distribution (4 / 12 kV) — grid trace, ~40 m positional | public AGOL, anonymous (explicit per-cell overhead flag) |
| Ameren Illinois overhead distribution (15 kV and below) — 250,891 GRID-TRACE lines (56,415 km) chained from 1,652,577 overhead hosting-capacity cells (of 1,671,052; the 18,475 underground are excluded server-side and never downloaded). Downstate Illinois, correctly excluding the ComEd Chicago metro. NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE: Ameren publishes 38.4 x 37.8 m rectangles, one per stretch of feeder, so the wire is somewhere inside its cell — max 26.9 m off, RMS 15.5 m, the tightest positional trace in the registry. Overhead is proven per cell (explicit ORIENTATION field), position is not, so it takes the positional-trace posture: klass minor_line, tier D when single-source, never a pack pin, candidate-excluded, and it never corroborates another source into tier A. THE 98.9%-OVERHEAD SPLIT IS REAL, not a broken filter: this is 15 kV-and-below distribution over rural downstate Illinois, and 1.65M cells x 38 m = ~63,000 km of route against Ameren's ~74,000 km of published distribution line. RECORD CORRECTION: the verdict's 'exactly 2,500 sq m (50 m x 50 m)' is the Web-Mercator Shape__Area — 2500 x cos^2(41.6 deg) = 1,397 m^2, so these are ~38 m cells and the FINER of the two grid traces, not the coarser. Ameren MISSOURI has no equivalent and never will: Ameren states the hosting-capacity map is Illinois-only and every electric service in the org is suffixed _IL. National tier only — there is no Illinois flagship region. | Ameren Illinois Company (AGOL org 3jEEGnl6c1x9Sze7) | IL (downstate) | distribution (<=15 kV) — grid trace, ~27 m positional | public AGOL, anonymous (explicit per-cell overhead flag) |
| Minnesota Power (ALLETE) OVERHEAD PRIMARY distribution — 125,673 of the 399,990 published polylines. ALLETE's own Esri Utility Network export, covering Duluth, the Iron Range, Grand Rapids, Vermilion and the Ely/BWCA edge, plus Superior WI through sister utility SWLP (both share the service). Overhead is PROVEN per SEGMENT, not per feeder: ASSETGROUP is the layer's own legended discriminator (506 Overhead Primary, 507 Overhead Secondary, 509 Underground Primary, 510 Underground Secondary) and the four counts add up to the published total exactly. The 93,508 underground segments are filtered out SERVER-SIDE at fetch and never downloaded — the ns-nspower discipline. NO VOLTAGE, CIRCUIT OR FEEDER FIELD EXISTS on the export (OBJECTID, ASSETGROUP, ASSETTYPE, GLOBALID, Shape__Length and nothing else), so kV is null on every segment and this is distribution-grade linework only — MP's 115/230 kV transmission is not in this service and remains HIFLD's. klass minor_line: candidate-excluded, tier D on its own, and its real value is corroborating the crossings OSM and HIFLD already see, plus giving the Duluth/North Shore region its first utility-sourced geometry | ALLETE / Minnesota Power — MNP and SWLP Basic Electric (EZ Estimator web map) | NE MN + Superior WI | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side ASSETGROUP filter) |
| Minnesota Power (ALLETE) OVERHEAD SECONDARY — 180,809 polylines, the ASSETGROUP=507 half of the same export. Split from mn-mnpower on the ab-fortis/ab-fortis-s and sk-sp-p/sk-sp-s precedent: primary and secondary run on the same poles, so one merged source id would let a service drop corroborate its own primary into a fabricated tier A. Secondary drops terminate at every customer, so this is candidate-excluded for that reason as well as the standing distribution one | ALLETE / Minnesota Power — MNP and SWLP Basic Electric (EZ Estimator web map) | NE MN + Superior WI | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side ASSETGROUP filter) |
| Exelon / Pepco Holdings SECTION-LEVEL OVERHEAD distribution for THREE operating companies at once — Pepco (DC + suburban MD), Delmarva Power (DE + MD Eastern Shore) and Atlantic City Electric (south Jersey shore + pine barrens): 667,565 of the 1,092,129 published polylines, extent lon -77.41..-74.10 / lat 37.96..39.89. True per-section conductor centrelines (9-580 ft, 2-25 vertices, Shape__Length and no Shape__Area) — NOT the ComEd grid-cell product Exelon publishes in Illinois. OVERHEAD IS PROVEN PER SEGMENT: `type` is a clean two-valued OH/UG flag (OH 667,565 / UG 424,564) filtered SERVER-SIDE, so the 424,564 underground sections are never downloaded — the ns-nspower / mn-mnpower / co-psco discipline, NOT mixed posture. RECORD CORRECTION: the hunt verdict named two corroborating fields for that flag and BOTH are false — F_looked_up reads 'UG' on 100% of the layer INCLUDING all 667,565 overhead rows (a broken lookup; fetching it would have printed the word UNDERGROUND on every overhead wire we pin, so it is deliberately not fetched), and CableType is a byte-identical copy of `type`, which is not a second opinion. The real corroborator is CONDUCTORCONFIGURATION: overhead-only pole framing (Horizontal, Pre-Assembled Aerial, Triangular, Vertical, Spacer, Compact) on 98.9% of OH rows and NULL on 100% of UG rows, no exceptions either way — crossarm framing is a physical property of overhead construction, so it is genuine independent evidence rather than a restatement. ONE SOURCE ID, THREE OPERATOR LABELS — DO NOT SPLIT into phi-pepco/-dpl/-ace: there is no utility column, the discriminator is the `Feeder` prefix, and it is exhaustive and disjoint by arithmetic (NJ% 309,229 + DE%|MD% 204,611 + 14|15|16% 150,946 + null 2,779 = 667,565 exactly) and by territory half-plane (every Pepco section west of -76.5, every Delmarva and ACE section east of it). This is ONE GIS export seen three times, not three independent observations, so three ids would let the slices fabricate corroboration into tier A (the SRC_ALIAS failure); the operating company rides per FEATURE in `operator` instead, so popups name the real utility while tiers see one source. NO VOLTAGE EXISTS anywhere in the layer (LEGACYRATING is a conductor rating code, not kV), so kv stays None and klass stays minor_line: tier D on its own, candidate-excluded for the mn-mnpower reason — with 424k underground sections deliberately never fetched, an overhead run ending at a bank is very often the circuit diving underground where we cannot see it. Confirms the Exelon-common-platform hypothesis: one fetch closed three EIA utilities | Exelon / Pepco Holdings (Pepco + Delmarva Power + Atlantic City Electric) — phi_section_hc, layer 0 'PHI Sectional Hosting Capacity' (nodal_hc_processed6) | DC/MD/DE/NJ/VA | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side type='OH' filter) |
| Xcel Energy — Public Service Co of Colorado (PSCo) SECTION-LEVEL OVERHEAD distribution: 299,429 of the 526,305 published conductor polylines, covering the entire PSCo Colorado footprint (lon -108.77..-103.07, lat 37.13..40.94) — Denver Metro and the Front Range, the Colorado headwaters (Dillon, Granby, Grand Lake, Kremmling), Grand Junction/Clifton/De Beque and the Western Slope. True conductor-following span-level segments (2-3 vertices each), NOT a hex/cell/parcel aggregation and not Esri sample data. OVERHEAD IS PROVEN PER SEGMENT by the layer's own OH_UG flag and the filter runs server-side, so the 200,733 underground segments are never downloaded; the 26,143 rows with a BLANK OH_UG are excluded as well, because returnDistinctValues shows TYPE and NOMINAL_VO are blank on that same subset — attribute stubs with no construction evidence, not 'probably overhead'. VOLTAGE IS DECODED, NOT GUESSED: NOMINAL_VO is a string ('7620 Volts') mixing line-to-neutral and line-to-line values, and counts on the overhead subset show 2400/7200/7620 V occur ONLY on 1-and-2-phase laterals (86,465 of 110,979 one-phase rows) and NEVER on the 99,505 three-phase or 77,591 Mainline rows, so those three are line-to-neutral and are scaled by sqrt(3) onto the standard 4.16/12.47/13.2 kV nominals the three-phase rows carry directly. Post-decode the layer spans 4.16-24.94 kV — PURE DISTRIBUTION, no transmission voltage anywhere in it, so PSCo's 115/230/345 kV transmission stays co-xcel's and HIFLD's job. klass minor_line: tier D on its own, candidate-excluded (200k underground segments we deliberately never fetch means an overhead run ending at a bank is very often the circuit diving underground). STRICTLY SUPERSEDES the retired co-xcelcarbond, a 113-span Fishbeck consultant slice of this same network around Carbondale — one network under two ids would fabricate its own corroboration. TIME-SENSITIVE: Xcel's live hosting-capacity viewer now serves PSCO_Blurred_Popup_GEN_June_2026 (144,127 blurred presentation polygons); these March 2026 raw polyline services are orphaned-but-public and unlinked from any app, and every guessed successor vintage returns 'Invalid URL', so this snapshot is the newest un-blurred conductor geometry Xcel has published for Colorado | Xcel Energy / Public Service Company of Colorado — PSCO_Conductors_GEN_March_2026 (Colorado hosting-capacity obligation) | CO | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side OH_UG='OH' filter) |
| PacifiCorp (Pacific Power + Rocky Mountain Power) OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION — 1,664 of 1,685 published lines across the full six-state footprint (CA/ID/OR/UT/WA/WY, lon -124.284..-104.958, lat 36.686..46.879), exploded to 1,689 line parts. From PacifiCorp's OWN AGOL tenant (PacifiCorp_Admin), not a county or consultant republication. OVERHEAD IS PROVEN PER FEATURE: Line_Type is an explicit OVERHEAD/UNDERGROUND field and the filter runs SERVER-SIDE, so the 21 underground lines are never downloaded. Carries the real line names (GRANTS PASS-MERIDIAN, HELPER-COLUMBIA-THOMPSON, TAP TO WEST RIDGE) and Line_Miles, but NO VOLTAGE — the layer has no kV field at all and PacifiCorp's circuit ids encode a district, not a voltage class, so kv stays None rather than being synthesised (the or-pge precedent). klass 'line': transmission-grade, so it is candidate-eligible and can reach tier B alone. CLOSES the PacifiCorp gap — until this ingest the project held one county-republished Hood River slice for a utility serving six states | PacifiCorp — Transmission_and_Distribution_Public (layer 3) | CA/ID/OR/UT/WA/WY | transmission | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side Line_Type filter) |
| PacifiCorp OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION — 2,058 of 4,192 published circuits, exploded to 624,704 span-level line parts across the same six states. OVERHEAD IS PROVEN PER FEATURE (Line_Type OH/UG, filtered server-side; the 2,134 underground circuits are never downloaded). The service publishes each circuit DISSOLVED into one multi-part feature (circuit 5R52 alone is 2,094 vertices over 136.6 miles), so the fetch explodes every feature into its constituent parts — a mean of 2.8 vertices per part, i.e. the parts are span-level segments and the 'feature' is only the circuit they belong to. Unexploded, the 60 m dedupe would collapse every crossing on a 136-mile circuit into one and report a lake span as a 136-mile wire. No voltage field exists. klass minor_line: tier D on its own, candidate-excluded. REPORTS UNDER src 'pacificorp' via lib_src_alias — one export of one utility's GIS, and the only places the two layers coincide inside the dedupe radius are joint-use corridors where distribution is underbuilt on the transmission ROW, which is a utility agreeing with itself. or-pacpwr-hr is aliased onto the same id: measured over its own extent, 2,580 of its 2,645 features (97.5%) have a part of this layer within 30 m | PacifiCorp — Transmission_and_Distribution_Public (layer 4) | CA/ID/OR/UT/WA/WY | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side Line_Type filter) |
| Dominion Energy Virginia PRIMARY DISTRIBUTION — 5,546 feeder centrelines exploded to 82,405 parts, covering Dominion's Virginia footprint plus its northeastern-NC tail (lon -80.24..-75.55, lat 35.58..39.30: Hampton Roads, Richmond, NoVa, the Eastern Shore, the Shenandoah and Roanoke Rapids). Published under Virginia's GTSA hosting-capacity mandate — the state-mandate vector working exactly as predicted. MIXED OH/UG POSTURE, STATED: no overhead/underground attribute exists on ANY Dominion service (all three — Residential, Utility-Scale/Primary and EV — were listed field by field), and Hampton Roads / Richmond / NoVa carry heavy urban URD, so this is the ca-pge / ct-eversource class: klass minor_line, candidate-excluded, tier D on its own. VOLTAGE IS DECODED, NOT GUESSED, and the field mixes domains: PRI_NOM_VOLT_CD counts over the whole layer are 19920:2502 / 7200:1128 / 7600:1030 / 13200:773 / 7960:86 / 26500:20 / 7940:5 / 2400:2, and 2400/7200/7600/7940/7960/19920 are line-to-NEUTRAL codes (none is a primary class line-to-line anywhere in North America, and 19.92/34.5 kV is the commonest US rural primary — which is why it is the biggest bucket on a utility whose rural backbone is 34.5 kV) while 13200 and 26500 are line-to-line as published. A separate OPERATINGVOLTAGE field disagrees with the nominal on a large minority of rows and is carried as an attribute only. DOMINION'S OWN CAVEAT: the hosting-capacity analysis excludes industrial and network feeders, so this is most-but-not-all of the primary system. Native SR is wkid 2284 (Virginia State Plane South, US survey FEET) — outSR=4326 is mandatory. NOTE Dominion Energy SOUTH CAROLINA has no equivalent: the only Dominion polyline service is Virginia's, and SC has no hosting-capacity mandate | Dominion Energy Virginia — EV_Hosting_Capacity_Available_EB (layer 14, PrimaryEV_Final) | VA/NC | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (mixed OH/UG, stated) |
| Duke Energy TRANSMISSION EASEMENT CORRIDOR TRACES (Duke Energy Carolinas + Duke Energy Progress) — medial axes extracted from 52,225 recorded electric right-of-way POLYGONS (of 66,384; the Gas easements are filtered server-side), covering lon -83.99..-75.71, lat 33.84..36.54 = the Carolinas from the Blue Ridge to the coastal plain. ONE SOURCE ID FOR BOTH OPERATING COMPANIES: Duke publishes no opco attribute, so DEC and DEP are inseparable from the data and two ids would be one dataset counted twice. CORRIDOR TRACE, NOT A CONDUCTOR CENTRELINE — this is the legal right-of-way, and a ROW is wider than the wire inside it by design; on a double-circuit or held-for-expansion easement there is no single wire to locate. So it takes the OEB CCIM posture: klass minor_line, tier D when single-source, never a ForeFlight pack pin, candidate-excluded, and IT NEVER CORROBORATES another source into tier A. THE MEASUREMENT IS THE BEST OF ANY TRACE THE PROJECT CARRIES and it still takes that posture: corridor widths are p50 20.8 m / p75 30.5 m / p90 51.7 m (against the CCIM's p90 of 272 m) and the extracted axis sits a median 0.3 m from the nearest HIFLD transmission line, with 92% inside 100 m. Two reasons that earns no promotion — (1) the ROW argument above holds at any ribbon width, and (2) agreement that tight between a deed-plat estate and a federal transmission layer is at least as likely to be COMMON LINEAGE (HIFLD's Carolinas transmission digitised from the utility's own plant/ROW data) as independent observation, and a source corroborating its own ancestor into tier A is the ENMAX/ConEd failure. The never-corroborates rule makes that provenance question moot rather than requiring it to be answered. ONLY conductor-following geometry Duke publishes anywhere: no distribution exists, and Duke's Carolinas hosting-capacity map is a 633x677 m hexagon aggregation grid (REJECTED, ComEd class). Attributes are County and a deed book/page only — no voltage, no circuit id, no phase. Native SR wkid 103122 (NAD83(2011) StatePlane NC ftUS), so Shape__Area/Shape__Length are in FEET | Duke Energy — DukeTransmission/0 'Duke Energy Transmission Easements' ([email protected]); republished by NC OneMap | NC/SC | transmission | public AGOL, anonymous (no warranty as to completeness or accuracy, per Duke) |
| Duke Energy Florida TRANSMISSION SLICES — 153 polylines merged from FOUR consultant project clips of Duke's internal transmission GIS: the DEF North-Central 2019 export around DeLand/Barberville/Orange City (48 features, 69-230 kV named lines), WSP's Marion/Citrus set around Ocala-Dunnellon (69), an 11-feature DLI slice that carries Duke's full 51-field transmission schema (OWNER_NAME, POINT_TO_POINT_NAME, OPERATING_VOLTAGE, AMPACITY), and WSP's Bronson-Newberry field survey (25). PARTIAL BY CONSTRUCTION — a few percent of DEF transmission and 0% of its distribution. ONE SOURCE ID for all four: one utility's one GIS seen through several consultants is one observation, not four. Transmission-only so implicitly overhead; no OH/UG field exists on any of the four, but there is no distribution in the layer to confuse it with, so klass 'line'. Duke publishes NO distribution conductor for Florida and no Florida hosting-capacity map exists to leak it (Duke's own AGOL org has zero Florida services) | Duke Energy Florida via Golder/WSP project publications | FL | transmission | public AGOL, anonymous |
| Duke Energy Indiana TRANSMISSION SLICES — 351 polylines merged from two Jacobs project publications: the Clark County Reliability Project (216, between Sellersburg and Henryville, all NORTH of the Ohio River so none of it is Kentucky) and the West Terre Haute / Vigo County project (135). PARTIAL — a slice, not the system. ATTRIBUTE-FREE by publication: OBJECTID/GlobalID/Shape__Length only, no voltage, owner or circuit name, so it is geometry you can trust for a hazard layer and silent about everything else. Transmission-only, klass 'line'. Nothing system-scale exists for DEI and this was checked exhaustively: no Indiana hosting-capacity or DER map, and gisdata.in.gov's 2,623 statewide 'transmission' polylines (1,368 owner LIKE '%DUKE%') are a verbatim HIFLD field list — a state redistribution of HIFLD, NOT utility-published geometry, and deliberately not counted as a source | Duke Energy Indiana via Jacobs Engineering | IN | transmission | public AGOL, anonymous |
| Duke Energy Ohio TRANSMISSION SLICE — 58 polylines in Ross Township / Millville, Butler County OH, just NW of Cincinnati and clearly distinct from AEP Ohio further east. PARTIAL — a slice, not the system. Duke OWNERSHIP IS ESTABLISHED RATHER THAN ASSUMED: the Name field carries Duke internal transmission segment ids (29858595, 29858672) from the same id space as a Stantec layer whose rows are stamped OWNER_NAME='Duke Energy Ohio'. THAT STANTEC LAYER IS DELIBERATELY NOT INGESTED even though it has the richer schema: all 23 of its features report USR_COUNTY_NAME='BOONE' and sit at -84.77..-84.67 / 39.06..39.10, which is Boone County KENTUCKY — DEO-owned plant physically across the river, already represented as ky-dukeky. Transmission-only, klass 'line'. The system-scale route is genuinely CLOSED for DEO: its Ohio hosting-capacity publication is a 7,451-cell hex grid at ~0.31 km2 per cell (ComEd-class REJECT) and no line layer backs it | Duke Energy Ohio via Jacobs Engineering | OH | transmission | public AGOL, anonymous |
| Alaska community-maps VILLAGE conductor — 8,891 OVERHEAD segments across 53 bush communities, the first source in this project that maps wires INSIDE an Alaska village. Overhead is PROVEN per segment (`Type_Powerline`: 8,891 Overhead / 485 Underground / 448 Unknown; the underground and unknown rows are filtered SERVER-SIDE at fetch and never downloaded). Each segment also carries its wire class — Primary 969 / Secondary 2,594 / Service 2,364 — and a per-feature contributing agency, which rides through as `operator`: Alaska DCRA 3,821, ALASKA VILLAGE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 4,218 (Brevig Mission, Elim, Gambell, Kivalina, Koyuk, Mekoryuk, Saint Michael, Stebbins, Teller, Togiak, Twin Hills, Wales), North Slope Borough 1,709, CRW Engineering 73. NAMED FOR THE PUBLISHER, NOT AVEC — AVEC is the largest single contributor but not the majority and not the publisher, and calling a North Slope Borough line in Point Hope 'ak-avec' on a pin would be a lie about provenance. klass minor_line: village primary/secondary/service on short poles, so tier D alone at national tier, candidate-excluded (its 2,364 SERVICE wires terminate at every house, and Alaska villages are built along riverbanks — ungated it would have fired a phantom bank-termination candidate at nearly every building in 53 communities). Its real product is the Alaska backcountry strip pack: 37 airstrips and seaplane bases that this project reported as clean now show surveyed wire | NOAA Office for Coastal Management / Alaska Geospatial Office — Alaska Community Maps | AK (53 communities, statewide) | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side Type_Powerline filter) |
| Doyon Utilities on-post distribution, interior Alaska — 5,559 OVERHEAD segments of 9,627, blanketing Fort Wainwright (Ladd AAF), Eielson AFB and the Tanana Flats / Yukon / Donnelly / Black Rapids training areas. THIS IS NOT GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC, though the research record filed it under that utility: `ownerName` reads Doyon Utilities on 9,128 rows, Eielson AFB 493, Fort Wainwright 4, CRREL 1 and Golden Valley Electric Assoc. on exactly ONE — it is Doyon's privatised military distribution sitting inside GVEA's geographic footprint, and the `GVEA`/`FROM_GVEA` circuit ids are the interconnect feeders. GVEA's own retail system is not published anywhere (checked: no GVEA AGOL org, maps.gvea.com has no REST root, the outage viewer is a vendor JS app with no geo endpoints, and the FNSB portal carries no electric layer). Overhead is PROVEN per segment from the SDSFIE 3.x schema (`electricalSegmentType`: ePriOhLineSegment 2,720 + eSecOhLineSegment 2,839 overhead; ePriUgLineSegment 553 + eSecUgLineSegment 3,515 underground, filtered server-side). The only one of the five new AK/WA distribution sources carrying real voltage — 12.47 / 24.94 / 138 kV, decoded from the coded-value string at fetch. klass minor_line. PUBLISHED APPARENTLY INADVERTENTLY on a university AGOL org; recorded as found, treated as a snapshot | US Army Alaska SDSFIE utility extract, republished on the UAA geomatics AGOL org | Fairbanks – Delta Junction, AK | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side electricalSegmentType filter) |
| New Hampshire Electric Co-op ROW/span survey — 25,132 pole-to-pole spans across all six NHEC districts (Alton 5,596, Andover 1,932, Colebrook 1,768, Conway 2,168, Plymouth 8,679, Raymond 2,665) plus the SP13 Sunapee feeder 2,324. NHEC is the utility that actually serves the Lakes Region and North Country shorelines, so this is float-plane country at span resolution: each feature is a 2-vertex segment 50–350 ft long whose endpoints coincide with poles in the service's companion pole layers (verified to 7 decimal places — Alton span endpoint -71.19716/43.44699 matches pole 313/32 exactly). MIXED POSTURE: there is no OH/UG attribute, and the overhead argument here is about the SURVEY (spans between mapped poles, selected for vegetation/ROW work) rather than a per-segment construction flag, so it takes the unflagged-source treatment — klass minor_line, tier D alone, candidate-excluded. SCOPE CAVEAT, and it can never be read as coverage: this is the 2025 work plan, ~730 line-miles of NHEC's ~5,600. Where a span is, there is conductor; where there is none, that means nothing. SEVEN SERVICE LAYERS UNDER ONE SOURCE ID on purpose — they are one survey cut by district, and per-district ids would cross-validate each other into a fabricated tier A at every district boundary. Hosted by TKG/TreeWorks, NHEC's vegetation contractor, not by NHEC, which is why a 'New Hampshire Electric Coop' search returns nothing and only the acronym finds it | New Hampshire Electric Cooperative, published by TKG (vegetation-management contractor) — NHEC_2025 | NH (Lakes Region + North Country) | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous |
| Clallam County PUD No. 1 primary distribution, north Olympic Peninsula — 6,068 OVERHEAD sections of 7,941, per-span 2–3 vertex geometry with feeder, substation and voltage. The PUD that serves Neah Bay, Sekiu, Clallam Bay, Forks, Lake Crescent, the Sol Duc and Hoh valleys, Dungeness and Sequim Bay; it pairs with wa-jeffersoncou to give the Olympic Peninsula both of its utilities for the first time. Coverage is system-wide rather than one feeder — 21 distinct substations, essentially every one Clallam PUD operates. OVERHEAD-PROVEN per section, and the obvious reading of the source is wrong: `Constructn`='UGP' (1,873 sections) is the only underground class and is filtered SERVER-SIDE at fetch; the 12DCL/14DCL classes LOOK underground because their conductor codes start 'DC', but every conductor code in this table does (DCACSR4/0 is bare ACSR on poles) — the real URD cables are the DCUCA/DCUPCA/DCCIC codes and they sit on the UGP rows. Verified before the filter was written, not assumed. `OperVolt` is 7.2/14.4 kV = primary distribution only, no transmission and no secondary, hence klass minor_line. COMPLETENESS CAVEAT: sum of section lengths is ~366 route-miles against a utility reporting ~1,300, because the source is the 2022 hosting-capacity study's modelled primary backbone — most of primary, not all of system, and no laterals | Clallam County PUD No. 1 — Potential MW Growth Capacity 2022 (Milsoft/WindMil section export) | Clallam County, WA | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side Constructn filter) |
| Lewis County PUD No. 1 trimmed-overstory spans — 4,106 per-span 2-vertex polylines scattered across 26–27 substation areas from Pe Ell and Boistfort east to White Pass, i.e. the Riffe / Mayfield / Merwin / Swift reservoir country and the Cowlitz drainage. Real conductor, not a schematic: `gs_old_layer_name` reads DBO.PrimaryConductor on every populated row, and rows carry conductor spec (2ACSR, 336ACSR), substation and feeder id straight out of the PUD's Milsoft/WindMil span table. MIXED POSTURE by the standing rule — there is no OH/UG attribute — though the physical argument for overhead is unusually strong here: the selection criterion is overstory vegetation trimming, which by definition only touches overhead spans, and `gs_subtype_cd` is uniformly 1 with bare-ACSR conductor codes throughout. klass minor_line, tier D alone, candidate-excluded. SCOPE CAVEAT AND IT IS THE MAIN THING TO KNOW: selection is spans trimmed in 2024–2026, so 4,106 spans is a single-digit percentage of a utility running 1,200+ route-miles. High-confidence TRUE POSITIVES, never a completeness baseline | Lewis County PUD No. 1 — Trimmed Vegetation Time Lapse Map (updated 2026-07-22) | Lewis County, WA | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous |
| NorthWestern Energy's WHOLE transmission system — 430 named circuits at 34.5/50/69/100/115/161/230/500 kV across Montana AND South Dakota on one layer. Not a slice: summed conductor length is 43,281,579 ft = 8,197 miles, matching NorthWestern's published transmission mileage, and 422 distinct circuit names across 430 features means roughly one feature per named circuit, each following its own conductor (the largest, 500 kV circuit 0265C, is a single 554-vertex path out of Billings). 336 circuits fall inside Montana, where they are the first utility-authored transmission this project has had over the densest float water in the Inland-Northwest pack — Flathead, the Swan–Seeley chain, Whitefish, Noxon/Cabinet Gorge, the Clark Fork and the Bitterroot. TRANSMISSION GRADE, so unlike the other Wave-8 smalls it is klass 'line' and candidate-ELIGIBLE (the ok-oge treatment). There is no OH/UG attribute and none is needed: underground transmission at 34.5–500 kV is essentially nonexistent outside city cores. ONE SOURCE ID FOR BOTH STATES — the 86 South Dakota circuits are marked only by a '-SD' suffix on the circuit name and ride under a `territory` field; giving them their own id would let NorthWestern corroborate itself into a fabricated tier A wherever a Montana circuit runs east. LIMITATION: transmission only, no distribution feeders — NWE publishes none, confirmed by walking all 6 services in their AGOL org and the operationalLayers of all 4 of their public web apps | NorthWestern Energy — Electric Transmission by kV | MT + SD | transmission | public AGOL, anonymous |
| Snohomish County PUD medium-voltage CORRIDOR AXES — 604 medial-axis polylines (3,092 km) reduced by pipeline/extract_snopud_centerlines.py from 382 dissolved ±50 ft buffer polygons, covering Everett, Marysville, Arlington, Lake Stevens, Monroe, Sultan, Granite Falls and Darrington. CORRIDOR TRACE, the on-ccim-* class, and the posture matters more than the geometry: THIS SOURCE DOES NOT LOCATE A WIRE. SnoPUD publishes its MV network only as this buffer — the underlying line layer MV_HOST_CAP_ALL_V2 is not public — so the axis is somewhere within the ribbon half-width of a conductor, and the ribbon covers the whole medium-voltage system with UNDERGROUND primary mixed in and indistinguishable. It is strictly weaker than the OEB CCIM corridors, which at least carry an overhead flag. Carried because ~5,400 implied route-miles is honest evidence that medium-voltage distribution runs those routes in a busy float region, and because it feeds the web map and the lidar queue: klass minor_line, tier D alone, pack-excluded, candidate-excluded, never corroborates another source into tier A (is_corridor_trace). The ribbon width was measured, not assumed — area/(perimeter/2) over all 382 features is a tight unimodal 30–33 m, consistent with the stated ±50 ft buffer and far inside the 50 m acceptance bar; 550 of 1,193 exploded parts still failed a per-part width test and were dropped rather than traced. CAMANO ISLAND IS ABSENT from the extract though SnoPUD serves it — a gap here is not an absence of wires | Snohomish County PUD No. 1 — MV_Circuit_Buffer50 (hosting-capacity buffer), hosted in their WATER GIS org | Snohomish County, WA | corridor-trace | public AGOL, anonymous |
| Alaska Energy Authority — Transmission (statewide) | Alaska Energy Authority | Alaska | transmission | public (AEA open GIS) |
| Kentucky Electric Power Transmission Lines | Commonwealth of Kentucky GIS | Kentucky | transmission | public (KY open data) |
| Miami OK — Primary Distribution (CAD) | City of Miami, Oklahoma | Oklahoma | distribution | public (municipal open GIS) |
| Xcel Energy NSP-Minnesota hosting-capacity GRID TRACE — 35,126 route lines (13,642 km) chained from 150,575 OVERHEAD presentation cells (of 226,756; the 76,181 underground are excluded server-side by OH_UG and never downloaded). NOT A CONDUCTOR LAYER: Xcel publishes Minnesota's hosting capacity as 'blurred' boxes, and the wire is somewhere inside its box — measured median footprint 141.6 x 133.4 m at lat 45.04, so positional error is 97.3 m worst case / 56.2 m RMS, the COARSEST of the three grid traces (SDG&E 42.5/24.6, Ameren 26.9/15.5) and WIDER than the 60 m dedupe radius. Positional-trace posture, enforced not asserted: klass minor_line, tier D on its own, candidate-excluded, and named in POSITIONAL_TRACE so it can never corroborate another source into tier A. AND IT IS NOT A LATTICE, unlike the other two — on circuit WAS092, 3,589 cells carry 2,898 distinct longitudes and the boxes overlap their own 98.8 m centroid spacing by 1.44x, so extract_grid_centerlines.py chains it by RADIUS (each cell to its 2 nearest within 1.6 pitches) instead of by grid adjacency; the lattice test kept only 26% of the route and that quarter was not a principled subset. Retention 79.6% of link length, 1 mesh component dropped. VOLTAGE IS DECODED, NOT GUESSED: NOMINAL_VO is volts-with-a-unit ('23900 Volts') mixing line-to-neutral with line-to-line, and a cross-tab of all 150,575 cells against Type/PHASE_DESI shows 7970/7200/19920/2400/14400/4800 V occur on 1-phase laterals 97-100% of the time and are therefore line-to-neutral (x sqrt(3) -> 13.8/12.47/34.5/4.16/24.9/8.32 kV), while 13800/12470/34500/23900/4160/24900/8320 sit on the three-phase and Mainline rows and are line-to-line as published. Post-decode the layer spans 4.16-34.5 kV — pure distribution. COVERS THE TWIN CITIES METRO LAKES, which no other Minnesota source does: Xcel's planning regions here are Minneapolis, St Paul, White Bear Lake, Minnetonka, Edina, Maple Grove and Newport (Minnetonka and White Bear are seaplane water) plus Southeast and Northwest MN and slices of ND/SD. Minnesota withdrew its state conductor layer in 2022, which is why this matters. NO RAW POLYLINE ALTERNATIVE EXISTS: Colorado's sibling service PSCO_Conductors_GEN_March_2026 is raw conductors (that is co-psco), but all 198 services in Xcel's AGOL org eM84fwjsSggLQk61 were enumerated and every NSP/MN hosting-capacity layer is a polygon; ten name-guesses on the PSCo pattern all return 'Invalid URL'. | Xcel Energy / Northern States Power Company - Minnesota (MN PUC hosting-capacity obligation) — HCA_NSP_Blurred_GEN_Popup_August_2026 | MN (+ WI/ND/SD slices) | distribution (grid trace / positional) | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side OH_UG='OH' filter) |
| Los Angeles Department of Water and Power overhead primary distribution — 153,197 of 211,078 polylines (OH_UG='OVERHEAD CONDUCTOR'; the 57,881 'UNDERGROUND CABLE' are excluded server-side and never downloaded). REAL span-level conductor geometry, not a cell aggregation: 2-vertex segments of ~40 m with GISID 'OHP…' = overhead primary. OVERHEAD IS PROVEN PER FEATURE by the layer's own OH_UG flag. Voltage_Class is a string enum with only two values, '4.8-KV' and '34.5-KV', decoded at fetch because volt_kv() nulls a number with a unit attached (the ok-oge '138 KV' correction) — pure distribution, no transmission voltage anywhere in it, so LADWP's 138/230/500 kV transmission and the Owens Valley aqueduct lines stay HIFLD's job. klass minor_line and candidate-excluded: 57,881 underground segments in the same network means an overhead run ending at a bank is very often the circuit diving underground (the co-psco / or-pge-d reasoning). Extent -118.67..-118.15, 33.68..34.33 = the LA basin and the San Fernando Valley. NO FLAGSHIP REGION COVERS THIS GROUND — scr's westernmost region (inland-empire-reservoirs) floors at lon -117.65 — so this is NATIONAL-TIER ONLY until an LA region exists; the water it would serve is Hansen Dam, Sepulveda Basin, the LA River, Silver Lake, Hollywood and Encino reservoirs. | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (DOE hosting-capacity atlas / EV charger siting) | CA (LA basin + San Fernando Valley) | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side OH_UG filter) |
| Orange & Rockland Utilities (Con Edison) nodal hosting-capacity segments — 157,285 OVERHEAD of 218,805 published, CONSTRUCTIONTYPE='OH' filtered server-side. Layers 0 (3-phase, 88,930 published / 79,060 OH) and 1 (1PH and 2PH, 129,875 / 78,225 OH) are MERGED INTO ONE SOURCE ID on purpose: they are two layers of one utility's own network, and counting them separately would let O&R corroborate itself into tier A — the rule ny-coned and ca-sce/ca-sce-s already follow. Same platform and same nodal schema as its CECONY sibling and BETTER than it: CECONY exposes no OH/UG attribute anywhere (hence ny-coned's mixed posture), while O&R ships CONSTRUCTIONTYPE per segment, so this one is overhead-PROVEN. Voltage comes from LOCAL_VOLTAGE on L0 and VOLT on L1 — same quantity, different column, already in kV. klass minor_line and candidate-excluded for the standard distribution reason (61,520 underground segments in the same network). Territory -74.90..-73.89, 40.92..41.69: Rockland and Orange counties NY, the Hudson Highlands, Greenwood Lake, Lake DeForest, and the northern-NJ lake country (Hopatcong, Wanaque, Monksville). NO FLAGSHIP REGION REACHES IT — mid's raritan-sandy-hook tops out at lat 40.90 and O&R floors at 40.92, a 2-minute gap — so national-tier only, and this is the strongest argument the wave produced for a future lower-Hudson / NJ-highlands region (Lake Hopatcong alone is an established seaplane lake). | Orange & Rockland Utilities (Con Edison) — NY Joint Utilities hosting-capacity obligation | NY (Rockland/Orange) + northern NJ | distribution | public AGOL, anonymous (overhead-only by server-side CONSTRUCTIONTYPE filter) |